Log in to see restricted items.
Rapporteringsstandaarden: aan welke criteria moet mijn artikel (studie, systematische review) voldoen vóór publicatie?
Een overzicht van de internationale rapporteringsstandaarden vind je op de webpagina’s over “Schrijven voor onderzoekers” op de website van het Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg Gent. Navigeer naar 'Aan welke criteria (of Reporting Guidelines) moet mijn artikel (studie, systematische review) voldoen vóór publicatie?
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
academisch schrijven
artikel
FFW
FGE
Recources: using Lean Library for e-sources
Lean Library is a tool that provides quick and easy access to online information sources and is a user-friendly alternative to VPN or Athena. With the Lean Library browser extension, you have our e-resources at your fingertips, on any website and from any location.
How does it work?You install …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
library
search strategy
Reference software: overview of tips
EndNote Starting with EndNote
Importing references in EndNote
- EndNote: importing a Mendeley library
- EndNote: importing references
- EndNote: importing references from Web of Science
Editing references in EndNote Read more
level: algemeen
tags:
academic writing
EndNote
refer
Reference software: reasons to use it
Reference software, also known as bibliographic software, allows you to collect, manage and use information in a systematic way.
The tool supports you in
- building your own library of references
- coherently integrating references and citations in a text, according to a certain citation style such as APA, Vancouver, MLA
- drafting …
level: algemeen
tags:
refer
Reference style: what is it?
A reference style defines the rules you have to follow to refer to sources. There are many different reference styles, often linked to a certain field. Also certain scientific journals have their own reference style. Some examples of reference styles are: MLA, APA, Vancouver, IEEE, OSCOLA,...
PointersReferences have to …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
academic writing
refer
Refereren: hoe refereer ik naar wetgeving als niet-jurist.e?
Voor een scriptie in juridische opleidingen zijn er strikte richtlijnen voor het refereren naar wetgeving. Maar wat als je wilt refereren naar wetgeving in een scriptie niet in kader van een juridische opleiding?
- Consistente referentiestijl: Gebruik dezelfde referentiestijl om te refereren naar wetgeving en andere bronnen. Vaak is dat …
level: algemeen
tags:
academic writing
refereren
Reporting guidelines: welke zijn er voor een studie en een systematische review?
In internationale reporting guidelines staat gepubliceerd aan welke criteria een studie of systematische review bij voorkeur voldoet om de transparantie van rapportering te bevorderen en reporting bias te vermijden. Op de webpagina’s over “Publiceren" op de website van het Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg Gent (in deze sectie 'Aan welke …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
artikel
FFW
FGE
systematische review
tijdschrift
Research Assessment: guidelines for evaluators
Ghent University is committed to evaluating research in a responsible manner. In doing so, Ghent University aims to recognize and value a broad range of research activities, diverse forms of impact, different career profiles, etc. Responsible evaluation helps Ghent University to do justice to the diversity in research, across …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
Research Data Management: What is RDM?
Research Data Management (RDM) is a broad term that encompasses all practices and actions to ensure that research data are secure, sustainable, and easy to find, understand and (re)use, not only during a research project, but also in the longer term. Taking proper care of data is an essential …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
open science
research data management
Research Integrity: attending training - the basics (online training tool Mind the GAP)
Adhering to the principles of research integrity is crucial for the quality and reliability of research. To take on that role in a conscious and proper way, developing your research skills (and thus attending training) is very important.
For this reason, Ghent University offers training for all its employees, ranging …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research assessment: How can you evaluate a science team?
Where possible, Ghent University's vision on research evaluation is also applied to the evaluation of science teams. This is the case, for example, with the Interdisciplinary Research Consortia aimed at societal impact (IDC). Some teams are not formally evaluated, but are looking for inspiration to evaluate their work on …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research assessment: guideline for responsible evaluation
Each research evaluation at Ghent University adheres to eight principles, which together ensure that research can be evaluated in a responsible and high-quality manner.
More on Responsible research assessment
1. The evaluation is necessaryV It is necessary, useful and meaningful for Ghent University to organize this evaluation at this …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research assessment: guidelines when using quantitative indicators (for evaluation organisers)
In general
There are many quantitative indicators, and new ones are still being developed. Examples of quantitative indicators include: the number of (scholarly) publications, number of citations, citation impact (normalized), number of downloaded (open access) papers, number of users of deposited datasets, number of mentions of a study/publication on social …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research assessment: tips and tricks for new evaluators
Ghent University (UGent) is committed to evaluating research in a responsible manner. Anyone asked by Ghent University to assess research – particularly in the context of the Special Research Fund (BOF) – can rely on the “Guidelines for research evaluators” as a practical tool for applying the …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
Research assessment: tips for researchers who want to use quantitative indicators in their CV, project application, etc.
There are many quantitative indicators, and new ones are still being developed. Examples of quantitative indicators include: the number of (scholarly) publications, number of citations, citation impact (normalized), number of downloaded (open access) papers, number of users of deposited datasets, number of mentions of a study/publication on social media and/or …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research assessment: what are ARRA and CoARA?
The Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) brings together research institutions, research funders, national accreditation agencies, scientific academies and their umbrella organizations, all aiming for a global reform of how research and researchers are evaluated. All CoARA members have signed the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA). Central to …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research assessment: what is DORA?
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) is a global initiative intended to guide the way in which research is assessed at the point of recruitment and promotion, and in the awarding of project funding. Since 2012, all actors involved in the evaluation of research – research performing and …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research integrity for trainers: knowledge clip 1 (of 7): the basics
This knowledge clip is intended for (potential) trainers and teachers in research integrity. There are 6 more knowledge clips - see further in this tip for more background.
Knowledge clip 1: the basics
Knowledge clip 1 is a general and rather theoretical introduction about what research integrity is, and …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity for trainers: knowledge clip 2 (of 7): the trainer perspective
This knowledge clip is intended for (potential) trainers and teachers in research integrity. There are 6 more knowledge clips - see further in this tip for more background.
Knowledge clip 2: the trainer perspective
In order to make a successful training module, stand-alone or as part of another course, …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity for trainers: knowledge clip 3 (of 7): the good researcher
This knowledge clip is intended for (potential) trainers and teachers in research integrity. There are 6 more knowledge clips - see further in this tip for more background.
Knowledge clip 3: the good researcher
In the exercise ‘the good researcher’ the trainees identify the characteristics of a good researcher. …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity for trainers: knowledge clip 4 (of 7): the lab
This knowledge clip is intended for (potential) trainers and teachers in research integrity. There are 6 more knowledge clips - see further in this tip for more background.
Knowledge clip 4: the lab
This clip contains the exercise “The lab – who and what“. The movie and roleplay “The …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity for trainers: knowledge clip 5 (of 7): the dilemma game
This knowledge clip is intended for (potential) trainers and teachers in research integrity. There are 6 more knowledge clips - see further in this tip for more background.
Knowledge clip 5: the dilemma game
The Dilemma Game has been developed by Erasmus University Rotterdam to stimulate awareness of research …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity for trainers: knowledge clip 6 (of 7): the middle position
This knowledge clip is intended for (potential) trainers and teachers in research integrity. There are 6 more knowledge clips - see further in this tip for more background. Knowledge clip 6: the middle position
One of the most interesting and meaningful things to do in a research integrity training …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity for trainers: knowledge clip 7 (of 7): closure
This knowledge clip is intended for (potential) trainers and teachers in research integrity. There are 6 more knowledge clips - see further in this tip for more background.
Knowledge clip 7: closure
This clip gives some inspiration on how to close or wrap up a workshop or class on …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity: ALLEA code – European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The ALLEA code
The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, is better known in the research community as the “ALLEA code”, simply because it …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research integrity: Commission for Research Integrity
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
There’s no clear-cut definition of research integrity, nor do we have a list of 'does and don’ts' that apply for all researchers, in all …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research integrity: a suspicion of violation– what to do?
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
We can situate research practices on a continuum from good to bad. Bad research practices include misconduct or fraud, on the one hand, and …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research integrity: attending training – in-depth training (dilemma training)
Adhering to the principles of research integrity is crucial for the quality and reliability of research. To take on that role in a conscious and proper way, developing your research skills (and thus following training) is very important.
For this reason, Ghent University offers training for all its employees, …
Read moreResearch integrity: reasons to care
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Why you should care about research integrity
Research integrity is part of quality assurance in research. Doing the right thing always improves quality and it …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research integrity: the 'slippery slope' from good to bad
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The continuum from good to bad
Research integrity is part of researchers’ professional responsibility and inherently connected to what researchers do (or not) in a …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment